Volume 16, Issue 6 (Special issue (Nov-Dec) 2022)                   mljgoums 2022, 16(6): 13-19 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Jamal I, Smita S, Raman R B, Choudhary V, Choubey S, Kumar K. Clinico-Hematological Profile of COVID-19 Patients: A Perspective of the Indian Scenario. mljgoums 2022; 16 (6) :13-19
URL: http://mlj.goums.ac.ir/article-1-1510-en.html
1- Department of Hematology- IGIMS Patna, Patna, India
2- Department of Hematology- IGIMS Patna, Patna, India , shuchi.smita123@gmail.com
3- Department of Pulmonary Medicine- IGIMS Patna, Patna, India
Full-Text [PDF 483 kb]   (523 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (2847 Views)
Full-Text:   (783 Views)
INTRODUCTION
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was first discovered in December 2019 in Wuhan, China, and has caused significant morbidity and mortality throughout the world. The World Health Organization (WHO) declared the COVID-19 outbreak as a global pandemic on February 2020 (1). The majority of COVID-19 patients have a minor respiratory tract infection, but a small percentage of them develop a more serious and systemic infection. Many individuals with severe COVID-19 have coagulation abnormalities that resemble those seen in other systemic coagulopathies, such as disseminated intravascular coagulation or thrombotic microangiopathy (2).
The majority of patients with COVID-19 are asymptomatic, although those with mild to moderate illness develop dyspnea. Acute respiratory failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome, metabolic acidosis, coagulopathy, and septic shock have been seen in severely ill patients. Early detection of severe illness risk factors facilitated adequate supportive care and, if necessary, immediate admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). The incubation period for COVID-19 is typically 14 days after exposure with the majority of cases occurring within 4 to 5 days of infection (3). Thrombocytopenia, prolongation of the prothrombin time (PT), international normalized ratio, activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), increased D-dimer, and decreased fibrinogen levels are the hematological and hemostatic derangements commonly seen in COVID-19. In addition, on peripheral smears, features of microangiopathic hemolytic anemia can be seen (4).
Several observational studies have suggested that the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte proportion, and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are inflammatory markers of immune-mediated, metabolic, prothrombotic, and neoplastic diseases, which can be used to predict prognosis in a variety of diseases (5, 6). Significant data regarding variations in hematological parameters concerning COVID-19 severity is missing from developing countries, such as India. The present study was done to evaluate the role of hematological parameters and basic coagulation parameters in the assessment of COVID-19 severity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
This retrospective observational study was done over a period of one year (May 2020 to May 2021). The study was carried out at the hematology department of a tertiary care institute in Patna, India. Hematological and coagulation profile data of 200 patients with COVID-19 were collected by convenience sampling method and then data was analyzed and evaluated retrospectively. We divided the patients into three categories: mild, moderate, and severe as per the WHO clinical guidelines for triage of COVID-19. Accordingly, the majority of the patients were asymptomatic, yet patients with mild or moderate illness experienced dyspnea a week after contact. Severely ill patients progressed rapidly to acute respiratory failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome, metabolic acidosis, coagulopathy, and septic shock. For mild patients, general isolation and symptomatic treatment were available, and ICU care was needed only when the condition worsened rapidly, to reduce the mortality and alleviate the shortage of medical resources. The incubation period for COVID-19 is thought to be within 14 days following exposure, with most cases occurring approximately 4 to 5 days after exposure.
Inclusion criteria were being COVID-19 positive by RT-PCR method and availability of data related to hematological and coagulation parameters. Patients with pre-existing chronic diseases such as kidney failure, heart disease, and liver disease as well as those who underwent immunosuppressive therapy for at least 2 months were excluded from the study.
Data related to age, gender, and clinical features were retrieved. Laboratory findings such as complete blood count, NLR, PLR, and coagulation parameters were compared. All procedures performed in the present study were approved by IRB and the Institutional Ethics Committee (reference no: 216/IEC/IGIMS/2021, date of approval: 05/10/2021) in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was also taken from all participants. 
Statistical analysis was done using the SPSS software (version 25). The Chi-square test was applied to test the association of qualitative data, and t-test was applied to test the association of quantitative data. Results were recorded as frequencies and mean ± standard deviations (SD). A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS
The majority of patients were male (59.5%) and aged 21-30 years (26.5%). The mean age of patients with mild, moderate, and severe illness was 25.77±12.38, 42.69±15.07, and 49.40±8.85 years, respectively (Table 1).
Table 1- Age- and gender-wise distribution of COVID-19 patients
Age range (years) Number of males (%) Number of females (%)
0-10 (n=5;2.5) 3 (1.5) 2 (1)
11-20 (n=24;14) 17 (8.5) 11 (5.5)
21-30 (n=49; 26.5) 32 (16) 21 (10.5)
31-40 (n=34;16.5) 21 (10.5) 12 (6)
41-50 (n=37;16) 20 (10) 12 (6)
51-60 (n=29;14) 14 (7) 14 (7)
61-70 (n=17;8) 9 (4.5) 7 (3.5)
71-80 (n=4;2) 2 (1) 2 (1)
>80 (n=1;0.5) 1 (0.5) 0
Total=200 119 (59.5) 81 (40.5)
Clinical severity (n;%) Number of males (%) Number of females (%)
Mild n=105(52.5) 58 (29) 47 (23.5)
Moderate n=60(30) 37 (18.5) 23 (11.5)
Severe n=35( 17.5) 24 (12) 11 (5.5)
Anemia was observed in 62.5% of COVID-19 patients and 94.2% of severely ill patients. Mean hemoglobin concentration in male and female patients was 11.9 gm/dl and 10.1 gm/dl, respectively (Table 3).
Leukocytosis was observed in 37.5% of cases, whereas leucopenia was seen in 6% of cases. Neutrophilia was seen in 40.5% of cases and neutropenia was seen in 10.5% of cases (Table 3). Lymphocytosis was seen in 5.5% of cases, while lymphopenia was observed in 39% of cases. Furthermore, 26 (74.2%) severe cases and 38 (63.3%) moderate cases had lymphopenia (Table 3). Moreover, the mean platelet count in male and female patients was 2.56±1.49 and 1.83±1.20 ×103/µl, respectively. Mean MPV in male and female patients was 8.47±2.09 and 8.20±1.25 fL, respectively. Based on the results, NLR was more than 3.5 in 39.5% of cases, with most of them having moderate and severe disease. Moreover, NLR and PLR were significantly higher in patients with moderate to severe illness. Values of PT, aPTT, and D-dimer were much higher in moderate and severe cases (Table 3).
Table 3- Frequency distribution of hematological parameters in COVID-19 patients based on disease severity
Hematological parameters Total  number(%)                 Clinical  severity
Mild          Moderate                     Severe
P value
1.Hemoglobin
Normal
Anemia

2. PCV
Normal
High
Low

3. MCV
Normocytic
Microcytic
Macrocytic

4. Total leucocyte count
Normal
Leucocytosis
Leukopenia

5. Absolute neutrophil count
 Normal
Neutrophilia
Neutropenia

6.Absolute lymphocyte count
Normal
Lymphopenia
Lymphocytosis

7.Platelet count
Normal
Thrombocytosis
Thrombocytopenia

8. MPV
Normal
Low
High

9. NLR
≥3.5
<3.5

10.PLR
>226
≤226
11. Prothrombin time
≤16 sec
>16 sec

12.aPTT
≤40sec
>40 sec
13. D-dimer
≤1mg/dl
1.1-2.5mg/dl
>2.5 mg/dl

75(37.5)
125(62.5)


50(25)
06(3)
144(72)


68(34)
125(62.5)
07(3.5)



113(56.5)
75(37.5)
12(6)



98(49)
81(40.5)
21(10.5)



111(55.5)
78(39)
11(5.5)


162(81)
27(13.5)
11(5.5)


132(66)
50(25)
18(9)


79(39.5)
121(60.5)


99(49.5)
101(50.5)


96(48)
104(52)


82(41)
118(59)

106(53)
26(13)
68(34)

53 (26.5)
52(26)


32(16)
01(0.5)
72(36)


65(32.5)
36(18)
04(2)



83(41.5)
21(10.5)
01(0.5)



84(42)
17(8.5)
04(2)



90(45)
14(7)
01(0.5)


87(43.5)
06(3)
02(1)


94(47)
10(5)
01(0.5)


07(3.5)
98(49)


12(6)
93(46.5)


53(26.5)
52(26)


67(33.5)
38(19)

89(44.5)
07(3.5)
09(4.5)

20(10)
40(20)


18(9)
05(2.5)
37(18.5)


02(1)
56(28)
02(1)



25(12.5)
29(14.5)
06(3)



12(6)
40(20)
08(4)



15(7.5)
38(19)
07(3.5)


41(20.5)
12(6)
07(3.5)


28(14)
20(10)
12(6)


49(24.5)
11(5.5)


55(27.5)
05(2.5)


34(17)
26(13)


11(5.5)
49(24.5)

14(7)
14(7)
32(16)

02(1)
33(16.5)


18(9)
05(2.5)
37(18.5)


01(0.5)
33(16.5)
0.1(0.5)



05(2.5)
25(12.5)
05(2.5)



02(1)
24(12)
09(4.5)



06(3)
26(13)
03(1.5)


24(12)
09(4.5)
02(1)


10(5)
20(10)
05(2.5)


23(11.5)
12(6)


32(16)
03(1.5)


09(4.5)
26(13)


04(2)
31(15.5)

03(1.5)
05(2.5)
27(13.5)


0.0000



0.0000



0.0000





0.0000





0.0000





0.0000





0.0000



0.0000




0.0000



0.0000


0.0000




0.0000


0.0000

PCV: Packed cell volume; MCV: Mean corpuscular volume; MPV: mean platelet volume; NLR: neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; PLR: platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio.
DISCUSSION
The COVID-19 epidemic has sparked a worldwide crisis and put global public health in jeopardy. The goal of this retrospective study was to determine the demographic and clinico-hematological profile of COVID-19 patients based on disease severity. Although extensive research has been done on COVID-19 in European and Asian countries, detailed analyses of hematological parameters in COVID-19 patients are lacking in India (3). Our findings indicated that those aged 21-30 years were affected the most by COVID-19. Previous studies reported age ranges of 15-45 years (5) and 31-40 years (6) as the most affected age group. In the present study, males were more frequently affected than females, which is inconsistent with the findings of a previous study conducted by Dawood et al. (5).
The majority of patients (52.5%) had mile COVID-19, while l7.5% of cases had severe illness. These findings are in line with the findings of Dawood et al. (5).
The NLR has been explored as a systemic inflammatory marker in peripheral blood and a valid prognostic factor in a variety of solid tumors and other chronic systemic diseases (7-9). In this study, 39.5% of the patients had an NLR of ≥3.5, and there was a significant difference in NLR depending on disease severity. Our findings are in agreement with the findings of two previous studies that reported a link between NLR and prognosis in a variety of viral illnesses (10, 11). Furthermore, we found that 49.5% of patients had a high PLR, all of whom had moderate or severe illness, whereas 88.5% of mild cases had a PLR of less than 226, which is in line with the findings of Huang et al. (11). We also found that leukocytosis was associated with moderate to severe illness, whereas leucopenia was only seen in 6% of all COVID-19 patients. Neutrophilic leukocytosis was seen in 40.5% of cases and neutropenia was seen in 10.5% of cases. Lymphocytosis was present in 5.5% of cases, while lymphopenia was seen in 39% of cases, the majority of whom had moderate to severe illness. These findings are consistent with studies done in Iraq (5), Ethiopia (6), and Bangladesh (12).
Most patients had a normal platelet count, and thrombocytosis and thrombocytopenia were seen in 13.5% and 5.5% of cases, respectively. However, some studies in Asia demonstrated an association between lymphopenia and COVID-19 severity and outcome (13, 14). This inconsistency could be explained by the difference in the ethnicity and number of patients as well as initial local treatment guidelines (15, 16). We found a significant association between the severity of COVID-19 and lymphopenia, leucopenia, and neutrophilic leukocytosis.  Thrombocytopenia was not associated with disease severity in this study, which contradicted the findings of a meta-analysis by Lippi et al. (17).
Lymphopenia has been considered a reliable measure of disease progression and severity, with magnitudes higher in dead and/or ICU-admitted patients than in non-severe or survivor patients. Other studies on critically ill patients in Singapore (18) and the United States (19) found a strong link between lymphopenia and mortality. Lymphopenia is also proposed as a useful prognostic marker for COVID-19. Li et al. evaluated hematological parameters on admission among COVID-19 and reported that non-survivors had a lower median lymphocyte count and a higher median neutrophil count than survivors (20). However, they found no relationship between the parameters and the risk of death.
In our investigation, increased lymphopenia levels were deemed as a predictor of disease severity. This could be related to the fact that severe (74.2%) and moderate (63.3%) COVID-19 patients had lymphopenia. This finding is in agreement with the results of some studies (6, 12). Yang et al. reported a minor difference in lymphopenia between non-severe and severe COVID-19 patients (10).
Given that lymphopenia is not specific to COVID-19 and is a common finding in the elderly, lymphopenia's predictive capacity will be enhanced when paired with additional criteria like neutrophilia and a high NLR (21). In this regard, we found that moderate and severe COVID-19 patients had 3.9- and 3.1-fold higher probabilities of having combination neutrophilia-lymphopenia than mild COVID-19 patients, respectively. Neutrophilia was a prevalent finding in severe individuals in most studies. In a study of 138 hospitalized patients in Singapore, neutrophilia was considerably more prevalent in patients requiring ICU admission (15).
Some studies have reported significantly higher neutrophil counts in critically ill patients compared with non-critically ill patients (20-22). Another research on 82 dead COVID-19 patients by Zhang et al. found that 74.3% of the subjects had neutrophilia on admission, which rose to 100% in the 24 hours before death (23). The cytokine storm that characterizes COVID-19 could be linked to the occurrence of neutrophilia. However, because neutrophilia can be caused by bacterial co-infections and the medication used for the treatment, cautious interpretation is essential (24). In our analysis, the overall burden in anemia was 62.5%, which is higher than the rate reported by 25.          Bellmann-Weiler et al. (24.7%) (25). This difference could be attributed to the poor socio-economic status of our subjects.
Anemic people have a higher risk of acquiring a serious disease. In line with our findings, two studies reported a significant association between hemoglobin levels and the severity of the disease (26, 27). However, because low hemoglobin levels might be caused by underlying comorbidities, age, etc., cautious interpretation is essential.
In a study by Bhuiyan et al., a comparison of coagulation parameters showed that median values of aPTT, PT, and D-dimer were higher in ICU patients than in non-ICU patients (6), which is consistent with our results.

CONCLUSION
The hematopoietic and hemostatic systems are significantly affected by COVID-19. Careful evaluation of laboratory parameters can assist clinicians in formulating a tailored treatment approach and in predicting disease severity and outcome. These hematological parameters are simple, inexpensive, and effective for assessing prognosis in resource-poor countries such as India.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to thank all those who cooperated with us in conducting this research.  

DECLARATIONS
FUNDING
The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethics approvals and consent to participate
All procedures performed in the present study were approved by IRB and the Institutional Ethics Committee (reference no: 216/IEC/IGIMS/2021, date of approval: 05/10/2021) in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was also taken from all participants. 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.
Research Article: Research Article | Subject: Pathology
Received: 2022/04/30 | Accepted: 2022/07/9 | Published: 2022/11/25 | ePublished: 2022/11/25

References
1. World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): situation report. Vol. 188. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2020. [View at Publisher]
2. Rothan HA and Byrareddy SN. The epidemiology and pathogenesis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak. J Autoimmun. 2020; 109: 102433. [View at Publisher] [DOI:10.1016/j.jaut.2020.102433] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3. Long B, Brady WJ, Koyfman A, et al. Cardiovascular complications in COVID-19. Am J Emerg Med. 2020; 38: 1504-1507. [View at Publisher] [DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2020.04.048] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4. Joob B, Wiwanitkit V. COVID-19 can present with a rash and be mistaken for dengue. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020; 82(5): e177. [View at Publisher] [DOI:10.1016/j.jaad.2020.03.036] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5. Dawood QM, Al-Hashim TZ ,Basim AA et al. Study of hematological parameters in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 in Basra.Iraqi Journal of Hematology 2020:160-65. [View at Publisher] [DOI:10.4103/ijh.ijh_49_20] [Google Scholar]
6. Bhuiyan Minz, Giti S,Hossen MSM, Rahman MM et al. Haenatologic profile abnormalities and Coagulopathy associated with COVID-19 .A prospective Study of 100 patients.Journal of Bangladesh College of Physicians and Surgeons. 2020; 38: 61-66. [View at Publisher] [DOI:10.3329/jbcps.v38i0.47347]
7. Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Mukanova U, Yessirkepov M,Kitas GD. The Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as an Inflammatory Marker in Rheumatic Diseases. Ann Lab Med. 2019;39:345-357. [DOI:10.3343/alm.2019.39.4.345] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8. Omran S Habib, Abbas K AlKanan, Aِlaa H Abed, Nihad QMohammed. Epidemiological Features of COVID-19 Epidemic in Basrah-Southern Iraq-First Report.The Medical Journal of BasrahUniversity. 2020; 38(1): 7-18. [View at Publisher] [DOI:10.33762/mjbu.2020.126943.1008] [Google Scholar]
9. Akboga MK, Canpolat U, Yuksel M, et al. Platelet to lymphocyte ratio as a novel indicator of inflammation is correlated with the severity of metabolic syndrome: a single center large-scale study. Platelets 2016; 27: 178-183. [View at Publisher] [DOI:10.3109/09537104.2015.1064518] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10. Yang AP, Liu JP, Tao WQ, Li HM. The diagnostic and predictive role of NLR, d‑NLR and PLR in COVID‑19 patients. Int Immunopharmacol. 2020; 84:106504. [View at Publisher] [DOI:10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106504] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11. Huang S, Liu M, Li X, Shang Z, Zhang T, Hongzhou LU.Significance of Neutrophil‑to‑Lymphocyte Ratio, Platelet‑to Lymphocyte Ratio for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in COVID‑19. China; 2020:1-14. [View at Publisher] [DOI:10.1101/2020.05.04.20090431]
12. Araya S, Wordofa M, Mamo MA, Tsegay YG, Hordofa A et al. The magnitude of Hematological abnormalities among COVID-19 patients in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Journal of Multidisciplinary healthcare. 2021;14: 545-554. [View at Publisher] [DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S295432] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13. Xu XW, Wu XX, Jiang XG, Xu KJ, Ying LJ, Ma CL, et al.Clinical findings in a group of patients infected with the 2019novel coronavirus (SARS‑Cov‑2) outside of Wuhan, China: Retrospective case series. BMJ. 2020; 368:606. [View at Publisher] [DOI:10.1136/bmj.m606] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14. Eastin C, Eastin T. Epidemiological characteristics of 2143 pediatric patients with 2019 coronavirus disease in China: Dong Y, Mo X, Hu Y, et al. Pediatrics. 2020; doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-0702. J Emerg Med. 2020; 58(4): 712–3. [DOI:10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.04.006] [Google Scholar]
15. Adhikari SP, Meng S, Wu YJ, Mao YP, Ye RX, Wang QZ, et al. Epidemiology, causes, clinical manifestation and diagnosis, prevention and control of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) during the early outbreak period: a scoping review. Infect Dis Poverty. 2020 Mar 17;9(1):29. [View at Publisher] [DOI:10.1186/s40249-020-00646-x] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16. Al Hijaj BA, Al‑Rubaye AK, Al‑Hashim ZT, Mohammed MA,Habib OS. A study on 696 COVID‑19 cases in Basrah‑southernIraq: Severity and outcome indicators. Iraqi Natl J Med. 2020;2:27-37. [View at Publisher] [DOI:10.37319/iqnjm.2.CSI.3] [Google Scholar]
17. Lippi G, Plebani M, Henry BM. Thrombocytopenia is associated with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‑19) infections: A meta‑analysis. Clin Chim Acta. 2020; 506:145‑8. [View at Publisher] [DOI:10.1016/j.cca.2020.03.022] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18. Fan BE, Chong VC, Chan SS, Lim GH, Lim KG, Tan GB, et al.Hematologic parameters in patients with COVID‑19 infection.Am J Hematol. 2020; 95: 131‑4. [View at Publisher] [DOI:10.1002/ajh.25774] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19. Arentz M, Yim E, Klaff L, Lokhandwala S, Riedo FX, Chong M, , et al. Characteristics and outcomes of 21 critically ill patients with COVID-19 in Washington State. JAMA. 2020; 323: 1612-14. [View at Publisher] [DOI:10.1001/jama.2020.4326] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20. Qin C, Zhou L, Hu Z, Zhang S, Yang S, Tao Y, et al. Dysregulation of Immune Response in Patients With Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) in Wuhan, China. Clin Infect Dis. 2020; 71:762-768. [View at Publisher] [DOI:10.1093/cid/ciaa248] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21. Gong J, Ou J, Qiu X, Jie Y, Chen Y, Yuan L, et al. A tool to early predict severe 2019-novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19): a multicenter study using the risk nomogram in Wuhan and Guangdong, China. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2020; 71(15): 833-840.31. [DOI:10.1093/cid/ciaa443] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22. Li Q, Guan X, Wu P, Wang X, Zhou L, Tong Y, et al.Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus‑infected pneumonia. Engl J Med. 2020; 382: 1199. [View at Publisher] [DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa2001316] [PubMed]
23. Zhang B, Zhou X, Qiu Y, Song Y, Feng F, Feng J, et al. Clinical characteristics of 82 death cases with COVID-19. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(7). [View at Publisher] [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0235458] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24. Qin C, Zhou L, Hu Z, Zhang S, Yang S, Tao Y, et al. Dysregulation of Immune Response in Patients With Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) in Wuhan, China. Clin Infect Dis. 2020; 71: 762-768. [View at Publisher] [DOI:10.1093/cid/ciaa248] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25. Bellmann-Weiler R, Lanser L, Barket R, et al. Prevalence and predictive value of anemia and dysregulated iron homeostasis in patients with COVID-19 infection. J Clin Med. 2020;9(8):2429.33 [View at Publisher] [DOI:10.3390/jcm9082429] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26. Tao Z, Xu J, Chen W, Yang Z, Xu X, Liu L, et al. Anemia is associated with severe illness in COVID-19: A retrospective cohort study. J Med Virol. 2021;93: 1478-1488. [View at Publisher] [DOI:10.1002/jmv.26444] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27. Cai SH, Liao W, Chen SW, Liu LL, Liu SY, Zheng ZD. Association between obesity and clinical prognosis in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. Infect Dis Poverty. 2020;9:80. [View at Publisher] [DOI:10.1186/s40249-020-00703-5] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2007 All Rights Reserved | Medical Laboratory Journal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.