Volume 13, Issue 1 (Jan-Feb 2019)                   mljgoums 2019, 13(1): 37-41 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Tamil Selvi M, Ankanagari S. Implementing QMS and Accreditation Standards in Medical Diagnostics for Quality of Services. mljgoums. 2019; 13 (1) :37-41
URL: http://mlj.goums.ac.ir/article-1-1144-en.html
1- Value added Corporate Services Pvt. Ltd, Chennai (T.N), India – 600 090
2- Osmania University
Abstract:   (3160 Views)
            Background and Objectives: Implementing quality management system (QMS) in medical laboratories improves quality of procedures and enhances the staff’s skill development. It prevents frequent inaccuracies in both clinical and laboratory procedures caused by lack of regulatory compliance, safety precautions and inadequate facilities. The purpose of this study is to evaluate effect of implementing QMS based on essential standards NABH (MLP) and NABL (ISO 15189:2012) in a medical laboratory on quality of services.
            Methods: Important quality indicators such as external quality assurance services (EQAS), rework, turnaround time (TAT) and feedback were monitored for four months, following implementing the QMS standards in a medical laboratory.
            Results: We found that implementation of the QMS program improved the tested indicators of quality. Overall percentage of rework reduced significantly.
Conclusion: Implementation of QMS improves overall quality of laboratory procedures. It significantly reduces laboratory errors and progressively improves quality, efficiency, and outcomes, thus enabling delivery of timely and accurate services for patients.
            Keywords: ISO 15189, Quality Assurance, Quality Improvement, Accreditation, Clinical Chemistry, India.
Full-Text [PDF 401 kb]   (673 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Paper | Subject: Laboratory Sciences
Received: 2018/11/23 | Accepted: 2018/12/22 | Published: 2018/12/22 | ePublished: 2018/12/22

1. Haeckel R, Kindler M. Effect of current and forthcoming European legislation and standardization on the setting of quality specifications by laboratories. Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation.1999; 59: 569-73. [DOI:10.1080/00365519950185373]
2. National Accreditation Board for Hospitals and Healthcare Providers (NABH). Medical Laboratory Program: Registered Private Labs [Internet].http://www.nabh.co/main/mlp/complied_pvt.asp.
3. National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration Laboratories (NABL): http://www.nabl- india.org/nabl/index.php?c=search&m=index.
4. Lee PKC, To WM, Yu BTW. The implementation and performance outcomes of ISO 9000 in service organizations: An empirical taxonomy. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. 2009; (26): 7. [DOI:10.1108/02656710910975732]
5. McAdam R, Canning N. ISO in the service sector: Perceptions of small professional firms. Managing Service Quality. 2001; 11(2): 80-92. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520110387202 [DOI:10.1108/09604520110387202.]
6. Archondakis, Stavros, Vavoulidis, Eleftherios, Nasioutziki, Maria. The Use of Mobile Health Applications for Quality Control and Accreditational Purposes in a Cytopathology Laboratory. 2016; 262-283. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-9861-1.ch013. [DOI:10.4018/978-1-4666-9861-1.ch013]
7. Rana BK, Behera NS, Nair SB. QCI - Medical laboratory program journey of quality in public medical laboratories": An experience though program evaluation. J Nat Accred Board Hosp Healthcare Providers. 2014; 1(1): 7-11. [DOI:10.4103/2348-6139.132915]
8. Lippi G, Plebani M, Ana-Maria Simundic. Quality in laboratory diagnostics: from theory to practice. BiochemiaMedica 2010; 20(2):126-30. [DOI:10.11613/BM.2010.014]
9. Guzel O and Guner EI. ISO 15189 Accreditation: Requirements for quality and competence of medical laboratories, experience of a laboratory. Clinical Biochemistry. 2009; 42(4-5): 274-278. [DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2008.09.011]
10. Theodorsson E. Quality assurance in clinical chemistry.A touch of statistics and a lot of common sense. J Med Biochem. 2016; 35(2): 103-112. doi: 10.1515/jomb-2016-0012. [DOI:10.1515/jomb-2016-0012]
11. Manickam TS and Srinivas A. Evaluation of quality management systems implementation in medical diagnostic laboratories benchmarked for accreditation. 2015; 6(5): 27-35.
12. Rahman Md. Quality Assurance (QA) in Laboratory Testing. Anwer Khan Modern Medical College Journal.2. 2011; 10.3329/akmmcj.v2i2.8163. [DOI:10.3329/akmmcj.v2i2.8163]
13. Paul RE. Quality control in clinical laboratory samples. 2015; https://www.mlo-online.com/quality-control-in-clinical-laboratory-samples.php.
14. Khatri R, Shrestha P, Sinha JN. Implementing self-sustained quality control procedures in a clinical laboratory. Journal of Nepal Medical Association. 2013; 52(189): 233-237. [DOI:10.31729/jnma.560]
15. Sarah B, Michael AM, Elisabeth D. Approaches to quality management and accreditation in a genetic testing laboratory. Eur J Hum Genet. 2010; 18 Suppl 1: S1-19. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2010.104. [DOI:10.1038/ejhg.2010.104]
16. Schneider F, Maurer C, Friedberg RC. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 15189. Ann Lab Med. 2017; 37(5): 365-370. [DOI:10.3343/alm.2017.37.5.365]
17. Carey RB, Bhattacharyya S, Kehl SC, Matukas LM, Pentella MA, Salfinger M, et al. Implementing a Quality Management System in the Medical Microbiology Laboratory. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2018; 31(3). pii: e00062-17. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00062-17. [DOI:10.1128/CMR.00062-17]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

© 2007 All Rights Reserved | Medical Laboratory Journal