Volume 13, Issue 2 (Mar-Apr 2019)                   mljgoums 2019, 13(2): 23-29 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Barzegari A A, Hashemzaei M, ASlihematti A R. Positive Effects of Spray-Dried Streptococcus thermophilus on Healing of Second-Degree Burn Wounds in Wistar Rats. mljgoums. 2019; 13 (2) :23-29
URL: http://mlj.goums.ac.ir/article-1-1124-en.html
1- Department of Biology, Faculty of Basic Science, University of Maragheh , Barzegaridoctora@gmail.com
2- Department of Biology, Faculty of Basic Science, University of Maragheh
3- Tabriz university of medical science
Abstract:   (1636 Views)
              Background and Objectives: Current medications used for the treatment of burn wounds have some side effects and disadvantages. Oral or topical administration of probiotic bacteria is thought to be useful for treatment of skin disorders. The aim of this study was to evaluate effects of spray-dried Streptococcus thermophilus on healing of second-degree burn wounds.
              Methods: After induction of second-degree burn on back of 80 male Wistar rats, the animals were randomly allocated to negative control (no treatment), first vehicle control (treatment with Eucerin), second vehicle control (treatment with skim milk) and experimental (treatment with bacterial ointment) groups. Wound healing rate (percent) and histopathological parameters of wound samples were evaluated on post-burn days 1, 3, 7 and 14.
              Results: On days 3 and 7, macroscopic results showed that the healing rate was significantly higher in the experimental group compared to the control groups. Histopathological analysis of wound samples showed increased fibroblastic migration, collagen formation and re-epithelialization in the wounds treated with probiotic bacteria compared with the wounds of control groups.
              Conclusion: Our results indicate that the topical use of spray-dried S. thermophilus could be useful for the treatment of burn wounds.
              Keywords: Streptococcus thermophilus; Probiotics; Burns; Wound Healing; Rats.
Full-Text [PDF 827 kb]   (437 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Paper | Subject: Microbiology
Received: 2018/09/25 | Accepted: 2019/02/13 | Published: 2019/02/13 | ePublished: 2019/02/13

1. Roberts AH. Burn Prevention—where now? : Elsevier; 2000.
2. Ahuja RB, Bhattacharya S. Burns in the developing world and burn disasters. BMJ. 2004; 329(7463): 447-9. [DOI:10.1136/bmj.329.7463.447]
3. Settle JA. Principles and practice of burns management. Churchill Livingstone; 1996.
4. Barajas-Nava LA, Lopez-Alcalde J, Roqué i Figuls M, Solà I, Bonfill Cosp X. Antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing burn wound infection. status and date: New, published in. 2013(6).
5. Cho A-R. Effect of silver sulfadiazine on the skin cell proliferation and wound healing process in hairless mouse 2nd degree burn model. Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation. 2002;32(2):113-7. [DOI:10.4333/KPS.2002.32.2.113]
6. Percival S, Bowler P, Russell D. Bacterial resistance to silver in wound care. Journal of hospital infection. 2005; 60(1): 1-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.jhin.2004.11.014]
7. Hossain MI, Sadekuzzaman M, Ha S-D. Probiotics as potential alternative biocontrol agents in the agriculture and food industries: A review. Food Research International. 2017; 100(Pt 1): 63-73. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres..
8. Araya M, Morelli L, Reid G, Sanders M, Stanton C, Pineiro M. Joint FAO/WHO Working Group report on drafting guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in food. London, Canada: World Health Organization, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2002.
9. Yeşilova Y, Çalka Ö, Akdeniz N, Berktaş M. Effect of probiotics on the treatment of children with atopic dermatitis. Ann Dermatol. 2012; 24(2): 189-93. doi: 10.5021/ad.2012.24.2.189. [DOI:10.5021/ad.2012.24.2.189]
10. Argenta A, Satish L, Gallo P, Liu F, Kathju S. Local application of probiotic bacteria prophylaxes against sepsis and death resulting from burn wound infection. PloS one. 2016;11(10):e0165294.
11. Sekhar MS, Unnikrishnan M, Vijayanarayana K, Rodrigues GS, Mukhopadhyay C. Topical application/formulation of probiotics: Will it be a novel treatment approach for diabetic foot ulcer? Medical hypotheses. 2014; 82(1): 86-8. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2013.11.013. [DOI:10.1016/j.mehy.2013.11.013]
12. Drago L, Iemoli E, Rodighiero V, Nicola L, De Vecchi E, Piconi S. Effects of Lactobacillus salivarius LS01 (DSM 22775) treatment on adult atopic dermatitis: a randomized placebo-controlled study. International journal of immunopathology and pharmacology. 2011; 24(4): 1037-48. DOI:10.1177/039463201102400421. [DOI:10.1177/039463201102400421]
13. Nole KLB, Yim E, Keri JE. Probiotics and prebiotics in dermatology. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2014;71(4):814-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.04.050. [DOI:10.1016/j.jaad.2014.04.050]
14. Di Marzio L, Centi C, Cinque B, Masci S, Giuliani M, Arcieri A, et al. Effect of the lactic acid bacterium Streptococcus thermophilus on stratum corneum ceramide levels and signs and symptoms of atopic dermatitis patients. Experimental dermatology. 2003;12(5):615-20. [DOI:10.1034/j.1600-0625.2003.00051.x]
15. Tsuchiya S, Ichioka S, Sekiya N, Tajima S, Iwasaki T, Numata S. The effect of a hydrocolloid dressing containing ceramide-2 on split-thickness wounds in a laser-induced erosion model. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2013; 26(5): 224-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000428952.00149.77. [DOI:10.1097/01.ASW.0000428952.00149.77]
16. Peighambardoust S, Tafti AG, Hesari J. Application of spray drying for preservation of lactic acid starter cultures: a review. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2011; 22(5): 215-24. [DOI:10.1016/j.tifs.2011.01.009]
17. Silva J, Carvalho A, Teixeira P, Gibbs P. Bacteriocin production by spray‐dried lactic acid bacteria. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 2002; 34(2): 77-81. [DOI:10.1046/j.1472-765x.2002.01055.x]
18. Mauriello G, Aponte M, Andolfi R, Moschetti G, Villani F. Spray-drying of bacteriocin-producing lactic acid bacteria. Journal of food protection. 1999; 62(7): 773-7. [DOI:10.4315/0362-028X-62.7.773]
19. Peral MC, Martinez MA, Valdez JC. Bacteriotherapy with Lactobacillus plantarum in burns. Int Wound J. 2009; 6(1): 73-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2008.00577.x. [DOI:10.1111/j.1742-481X.2008.00577.x]
20. Rodrigues KL, Caputo LRG, Carvalho JCT, Evangelista J, Schneedorf JM. Antimicrobial and healing activity of kefir and kefiran extract. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2005; 25(5): 404-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2004.09.020]
21. Pereira T, Dos Santos D, Lima-Ribeiro MHM, de Pontes-Filho NT, Carneiro-Leão AMdA, Correia MTdS. Development of animal model for studying deep second-degree thermal burns. BioMed Research International. 2012; http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/460841. [DOI:10.1155/2012/460841]
22. Fish R, Danneman PJ, Brown M, Karas A. Anesthesia and analgesia in laboratory animals. 2nd ed. Academic Press. 2008.
23. Gonzalez ACdO, Costa TF, Andrade ZdA, Medrado ARAP. Wound healing-A literature review. An Bras Dermatol. 2016; 91(5): 614-620. doi: 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20164741. [DOI:10.1590/abd1806-4841.20164741]
24. Della Riccia D, Bizzini F, Perilli M, Polimeni A, Trinchieri V, Amicosante G, et al. Anti‐inflammatory effects of Lactobacillus brevis (CD2) on periodontal disease. Oral Diseases. 2007;13(4):376-85. DOI:10.1111/j.1601-0825.2006.01291.x. [DOI:10.1111/j.1601-0825.2006.01291.x]
25. von Schillde M-A, Hörmannsperger G, Weiher M, Alpert C-A, Hahne H, Bäuerl C, et al. Lactocepin secreted by Lactobacillus exerts anti-inflammatory effects by selectively degrading proinflammatory chemokines. Cell host & microbe. 2012; 11(4): 387-96. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2012.02.006. [DOI:10.1016/j.chom.2012.02.006]
26. Kekkonen RA, Lummela N, Karjalainen H, Latvala S, Tynkkynen S, Järvenpää S, et al. Probiotic intervention has strain-specific anti-inflammatory effects in healthy adults. World J Gastroenterol. 2008; 14(13): 2029-36. [DOI:10.3748/wjg.14.2029]
27. Fang W, Shi M, Huang L, Chen J, Wang Y. Antagonism of lactic acid bacteria towards Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli on agar plates and in milk. Veterinary research. 1996; 27(1): 3-12.
28. Xue M, Jackson CJ. Extracellular matrix reorganization during wound healing and its impact on abnormal scarring. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2015;4(3):119-136. [DOI:10.1089/wound.2013.0485]
29. Tredget EE, Shankowsky HA, Joffe AM, Inkson TI, Volpel K, Paranchych W, et al. Epidemiology of infections with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in burn patients: the role of hydrotherapy. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 1992; 15(6): 941-9. [DOI:10.1093/clind/15.6.941]
30. Lari AR, Alaghehbandan R, Akhlaghi L. Burn wound infections and antimicrobial resistance in Tehran, Iran: an increasing problem. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2005;18(2):68.
31. Klaenhammer TR. Bacteriocins of lactic acid bacteria. Biochimie. 1988; 70(3): 337-49. [DOI:10.1016/0300-9084(88)90206-4]
32. Huseini HF, Rahimzadeh G, Fazeli MR, Mehrazma M, Salehi M. Evaluation of wound healing activities of kefir products. Burns. 2012;38(5):719-23. [DOI:10.1016/j.burns.2011.12.005]
33. Delorme C. Safety assessment of dairy microorganisms: Streptococcus thermophilus. Int J Food Microbiol. 2008; 126(3): 274-7. DOI:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.08.014. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.08.014]
34. Bolotin A, Quinquis B, Renault P, Sorokin A, Ehrlich SD, Kulakauskas S, et al. Complete sequence and comparative genome analysis of the dairy bacterium Streptococcus thermophilus. Nature biotechnology. 2004; 22(12): 1554-8. [DOI:10.1038/nbt1034]
35. Bartek MJ, Labudde JA, Maibach HI. Skin permeability in vivo: comparison in rat, rabbit, pig and man. J Invest Dermatol. 1972; 58(3): 114-23. [DOI:10.1111/1523-1747.ep12538909]
36. Barber ED, Teetsel NM, Kolberg KF, Guest D. A comparative study of the rates of in vitro percutaneous absorption of eight chemicals using rat and human skin. Fundamental and Applied Toxicology. 1992; 19(4): 493-7. [DOI:10.1016/0272-0590(92)90086-W]
37. Van Ravenzwaay B, Leibold E. A comparison between in vitro rat and human and in vivo rat skin absorption studies. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2004; 23(9): 421-30. [DOI:10.1191/0960327104ht471oa]
38. Dorsett‐Martin WA. Rat models of skin wound healing: a review. Wound Repair Regen. 2004;12(6):591-9. [DOI:10.1111/j.1067-1927.2004.12601.x]
39. Gottrup F, Ågren MS, Karlsmark T. Models for use in wound healing research: a survey focusing on in vitro and in vivo adult soft tissue. Wound Repair and Regeneration. 2000;8(2):83-96. [DOI:10.1046/j.1524-475x.2000.00083.x]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

© 2007 All Rights Reserved | Medical Laboratory Journal