Volume 16, Issue 2 (Mar-Apr 2022)                   mljgoums 2022, 16(2): 1-6 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Najjari M, Karimazar M, Ebrahimipour M, M. Budke C. A Review of Ethical Issues Related to Laboratory-Based Diagnostics. mljgoums 2022; 16 (2) :1-6
URL: http://mlj.goums.ac.ir/article-1-1457-en.html
1- Department of Parasitology and Mycology, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
2- Savojbolagh Health Center, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Alborz, Iran
3- Research Center for Hydatid Disease in Iran, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran , md.ebrahimi31@gmail.com
4- Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
Full-Text [PDF 800 kb]   (639 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (1521 Views)
Full-Text:   (2154 Views)
INTRODUCTION
Medical ethics is a sub-discipline of bioethics, which focuses on different aspects of medical sciences-related ethics, including social and religious values [1]. Clinical diagnostic laboratories should follow their own set of ethical practice guidelines, ideally based on the four fundamental areas outlined by the World Health Organization (WHO): autonomy, beneficence, non-malfeasance, and justice [2]. These principles concern the right of patients to make decisions on their own behalf and obligate the personnel to act in the best interest of the patient, avoiding harm to patients and maintaining fairness and respect [2-6]. The main roles of laboratories are to perform biological, biochemical, microbiological, and genetic tests to assist reliable diagnosis and treatment of health-threatening diseases [3, 6, 7].
Given the importance of applying ethical principles, the WHO and the International Organization for Standardization have produced guidelines for clinical laboratory personnel [8]. These guidelines provide a framework for performing and reporting diagnostic tests with an emphasis on patient satisfaction and confidentiality, and for storing and retaining medical records [9]. Despite the important role of laboratory-based diagnostics in maintaining and promoting health, ethical issues concerning diagnostic laboratories have not been analyzed in detail [10]. Clinical laboratories should be updated to reflect current rules and regulations [11]. Laboratories must also abide by the newest standards regarding patients’ rights, munificence, welfare, and comfort [3]. Moreover, laboratories should prioritize and respect a patient’s beliefs and culture. Laboratory personnel has to follow the principles of truthfulness, responsibility, conscientiousness, loyalty, equity, discipline, and benevolence while maintaining patient privacy and societal considerations. Laboratories should hire personnel who are trained in and display professional ethics, positive patient relations, diligence to the job, and observation of safety protocols [2, 7, 12, 13].
Laboratory providers are responsible for the quality assurance of presented services. The relationship between patient and laboratory‍ is complex because of the potential of ethical issues arising in the pre-analytic, analytic, and post-analytic phases [14]. The pre-analytic phase includes specimens labeling and handling prior to arrival at the laboratory. Improper labeling and handling of specimens during this phase can result in negative outcomes including incorrect diagnosis, inappropriate treatment, treatment delays, and unnecessary medical interventions e.g. additional surgery. Positive outcomes and patient safety depend strongly on handling specimens in standard ways [15]. Regarding the importance of this phase, precise control measures are needed to avoid unintentional errors. Laboratories and specimen collectors must consider and maintain ethical standards [14]. The analytic phase includes procedures, diagnostic tests, and the application of related products. Confidentiality, competence, and quality are concerns at this phase. Compared with larger laboratories, small laboratories that perform manual testing and operations often find confidentially to be a challenging task during the analytic phase [12]. Laboratory tests should be carried out according to pre-approved procedures and only by trained personnel. Moreover, a supervisory structure should be in place to monitor employees’ performance [7, 14, 16]. In the post-analytic phase, interpretation of results, archiving of specimens, accessibility of data, and confidentiality should be considered [2, 3]. Different laboratories have different policies for archiving specimens. The use of electronic or hard copy archiving is a basic principle of acceptable laboratory practice [17]. Laboratory information should be correctly and securely maintained, and results could be shared only with the patient’s consent. The laboratory is responsible for the secure transfer of reports and ensuring that information is not altered or misused [14, 18, 19]. Access to medical laboratory records should normally be available only to the clinician requesting the test, the patient, and laboratory/hospital staff for the management of the patient [6]. When an authorized person requests access to test results, the laboratory must first confirm the identity of the person making the request. Children and intellectually impaired individuals have the same right of access as competent adults, although this right may be expressed through a parent or authorized agent [20]. However, parents do not always have an automatic right to access their children’s medical information, and different countries have different laws and customs in this respect [6]. The laboratory should develop protocols on how to handle different requests, taking into account local laws and customs. How this is done, and the stringency with which identities, must be verified by institution and situation. For example, the required degree of stringency for confirming the identity of a person seeking an HIV test result may be much greater than that required of one requesting the results of a routine hemoglobin test [6, 20, 21]. The objective of this study was to review and introduce general ethical issues that any person may encounter during the test-requesting, performance, and reporting of laboratory-based diagnostic testing.
 
 
METHODS
Data resources and search strategy
In order to find ethical issues related to laboratory-based diagnostics, a systematic review of relevant studies published on electronic databases including the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Medline, and Cochrane Library were collected for the years 1975 to 2020.
 
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
All original articles published in English that discussed ethical aspects of the medical laboratory were included in the review. Studies not approved by ethics committees and irrelevant articles were excluded from the study.
 
 
 
RESULTS
After excluding irrelevant and duplicate articles, out of 145 selected articles for evaluation only 35 articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Relevant studies were evaluated in-depth and extracted data were categorized into the following sections.
 
1) Ethical issues related to laboratory diagnosis and patients 
A: Good and effective health services with respect and equal treatment without considering economic, racial, cultural, religious, political, and social reputations is the right to every patient [22].
B: Having sufficient scientific or clinical information about the history of communicable infectious diseases such as hepatitis and AIDS is required in each clinical laboratory[2].
C: Organizing and selecting the test, in general, should be done regardless of the patient's economic and social status and in accordance with symptoms of the disease. Also, the laboratory should avoid unnecessarily re-refer of a patient to physician [23].
D: The necessity of testing, required specimens, and sampling procedure should be explained clearly by the laboratory to patients prior to testing. This enables the patient to freely decide for testing, and all procedures will be done with the informed consent of the client [6].
E: Standard and well-known diagnosis procedures should be applied at an acceptable level of professional competence. In the cases of damage to patients, the test should be repeated or replaced by other reliable tests [6].
F: The results of the test must be clear, legible, and without mistakes [2].
G: The laboratory should assure that the results of tests are completely private and not shared with any individual or organizations. Data and results of the tests, even after death, should be kept in good order and protected to prevent loss and any unauthorized use. The information must be archived in a way that is accessible only to qualified individuals [24].
 
 
2) Ethics in clinical diagnosis and colleagues
Applying professional ethics among all related clinicians and laboratorians should be prioritized during the diagnosis and treatment of each patient. The important ethical issues concerning the clinicians and laboratorians are listed below:
A: Important ethical principles for the establishment of the laboratory include professional expertise, having the necessary scientific and practical competence, conscientiousness, professional responsibility, and lack of physical or psychological utilization of the patient [21].
B: Laboratory staff should respect their profession and the reliability of their colleagues. They need to enhance their professional qualifications by strengthening their academic background and working collaboratively with other laboratories [25].
C: the most important case of conflict of interest is the establishment of a financial relationship between the referring physicians and the laboratory [26].
 
3)  Ethical topics in clinical laboratories and the society
A: The staff of medical laboratories are responsible for considering the general rights of clients. The principle of justice, non-discrimination between patients, and the need for public access to medical services regardless of religion and political affiliation are the basic issues of medical ethics involving laboratories [27].
 
DISCUSSION
Ethical issues related to laboratory-based diagnostics were surveyed and highlighted in this study. Precision, speed, observance of ethics and maintaining lending, confidentiality along with the application of scientific and technical methods based on the latest standards are very important features that can pave the way for the advancement of a clinical diagnostic laboratory. Novel pharmaceutics, genetics, and clinical laboratory technologies not only are used for diagnosis and treatment but also to strengthen human behaviors and capacities [7]. General training and discussion about ethical aspects in clinical laboratories should be implemented for the public to increase awareness about human rights and ethics in laboratories [13, 16, 28]. Although some laws have been developed at international levels in this regard, the addressed questions and discussions in this field have no easy or agreed-upon response. However, people’s satisfaction, confidentiality, and individual access right to gained information should be taken into account. The progress of knowledge and technology in the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of diseases has significantly changed medicine [13, 29]. Instructors of ethics courses should advise medical and pre-medical students about the dignity of patients by discussing their valuable personal experiences. Ethic instructors should also explain the reward of sitting beside the patient and checking the patient’s soul and body, so that good and humane behavior of a physician with a patient should be maintained in all professional duties. Ways of logging, collecting, storing, and reporting results should be consistent with general fundamentals [18]. Being up to date, explaining the test and results, and keeping the information confidential are important in this regard [7, 19]. An awareness of the fundamentals of laboratory ethics will play a substantial role in the performance of laboratory personnel and encourage them to more readily respect the dignity of their patients. The study of laboratory ethics should be prioritized for medical and allied health students as well as any healthcare staff, particularly laboratory staff, and managers. [16, 28, 29]. The growth of pharmaceutical and laboratory sciences in recent years makes the subject of ethics more important and meaningful. During the past decades, implementation of health education programs for the public and laboratory clients was not a priority, but given the recent advancements in modern digitalization and internet technology, many laboratories provide some information about the different stages of laboratory testing procedures. These laboratories informed their clients how to prepare themselves for sampling and laboratory attendance. Undoubtedly, training at this level can change client behavior and is morally acceptable.
Ethical issues should be considered at all phases of laboratory procedures [21]. One study in the United States found that laboratory mentors devoted insufficient time to teach ethical issues for laboratorians. The researchers suggested that ethics courses are necessary for students and personnel to improve their skills in ethical topics. [30]. Programs to improve education in medical laboratory sciences usually emphasize learning new techniques in different aspects of medical ethics and are necessary for students’ professional development [13, 31]. However, issues regarding professional ethics may sometimes take place and laboratory providers should be well acquainted with fundamental ethical issues so they can proceed appropriately in such cases [32, 33]. Absolutely, education of ethical issues for laboratory providers promotes good communication between patients and physicians [34]. Laboratory ethic committees should hold ethical courses for personnel and apply appropriate policies when ethical issues occur [35]. Physical and mental conditions, along with data and privacy concerns as patients' rights should be considered in every laboratory [4]. Because of the importance of ethical issues, a close relationship is needed between laboratories and related authorities. Indeed, the results of laboratory tests are important for all laboratory providers. These results help physicians to precisely choose treatments for patients.
Comprehensive training about medical ethics should be scheduled in the laboratory programs and the associated information should be available to the public and other laboratories. Due to the possibility of the emergence of new challenges in medical ethics, the principles of ethical laws should be flexible and ready for a change in the future.  All clinicians and laboratorians are required to be up to date and committed to consider all ethical issues in their workplaces.
Although confidentiality is a very important issue in medical laboratories, in the case of public interest and emergencies test results could be taken into account after the patient’s awareness. Informed.
Conflict of interest is another issue that needs to be addressed in laboratories. For this purpose, it is necessary to elaborate relevant ethical codes and strategies for preventing and managing conflict of interest in laboratories. With the advent of new technologies, laboratory equipment has become significantly smaller, delicate, and more efficient, but these developments will introduce some challenges for medical diagnostic laboratories. Minimizing manpower is one of the outcomes that can endanger the job security of laboratory staff. Performing laboratory tests using microchip technologies in physician’s offices could be another challenge facing medical diagnostic laboratories. The mentioned issues were some of the challenges that new generation-laboratories will face, which must be considered also from the ethical point of view.

CONCLUSION
From the ethical point of view, no discrimination in the provision of laboratory services to society is acceptable. Clients must be aware of their legal rights and the principle of confidentiality in laboratories. The relationship and behavior between the staff/physician and the patient should be well to eliminate or minimize patients’ physical and mental harm. Nowadays, consideration of ethical issues is key to professionalize laboratories, and related education and practices are essential when training competent laboratory providers, which will ultimately improve laboratory services [11, 13, 16, 28].
 
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to thank Ms. Catherine Jackson and Dr. Barbara Gastel for their editorial assistance.
 
DECLARATIONS
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
 
Ethics approvals and consent to participate
Not applicable.
 
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article
Research Article: Review Article | Subject: Biochemistry
Received: 2021/10/30 | Accepted: 2022/01/4 | Published: 2022/03/7 | ePublished: 2022/03/7

References
1. Dzik WH. Emily Cooley Lecture 2002: transfusion safety in the hospital. Transfusion. 2003; 43(9): 1190-9. [View at Publisher] [DOI:10.1046/j.1537-2995.2003.00523.x] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2. El-Nageh M. Ethical practice in laboratory medicine and forensic pathology. 1999, Alexandria, Egypt: World Health Organization, Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean.1999. [Google Scholar]
3. Arora DR, Arora B. Ethics in laboratory medicine. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2007; 25(3): 179-80. [DOI:10.1016/S0255-0857(21)02103-4] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4. Leino-Kilpi H, Nyrhinen T, Katajisto J. Patients' rights in laboratory examinations: do they realize? Nurs Ethics. 1997; 4(6): 451-64. [DOI:10.1177/096973309700400602] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5. Macleod MR, Fisher M, O'Collins V, Sena ES, Dirnagl U, Bath PM, et al. Reprint: Good laboratory practice: preventing introduction of bias at the bench. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2009; 29(2): 221-3. [View at Publisher] [DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.525386] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6. Nyrhinen T, Leino-Kilpi H. Ethics in the laboratory examination of patients. J Med Ethics. 2000; 26(1): 54-60. [DOI:10.1136/jme.26.1.54] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7. Wood J. The role, duties and responsibilities of technologists in the clinical laboratory. Clin Chim Acta. 2002; 319(2): 127-32. [View at Publisher] [DOI:10.1016/S0009-8981(02)00033-5] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8. Collier R. WHO guidelines on ethical public health surveillance. CMAJ. 2017; 189(29): E977. [View at Publisher] [DOI:10.1503/cmaj.1095453] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9. Burnett L, McQueen MJ, Jonsson JJ, Torricelli F. IFCC Taskforce on Ethics [13.7]. IFCC position paper: report of the IFCC taskforce on ethics: introduction and framework. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2007; 45(8): 1098-104. [DOI:10.1515/CCLM.2007.199] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10. Ashcroft R. Fair process and the redundancy of bioethics: a polemic. Public Health Ethics. 2008; 1(1): 3-9. [View at Publisher] [DOI:10.1093/phe/phn004] [Google Scholar]
11. Nikravanfard N, Khorasanizadeh F, Zendehdel K. Research Ethics Education in Post-Graduate Medical Curricula in I.R. Iran. Dev World Bioeth. 2017; 17(2): 77-83. [View at Publisher] [DOI:10.1111/dewb.12122] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12. Sekadde-Kigondu CB. Ethical Considerations in Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 2016. [Google Scholar]
13. Bruns DE. Improving training in laboratory medicine. Clin Chim Acta. 2008; 393(1): 3-4. [View at Publisher] [DOI:10.1016/j.cca.2008.03.018] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14. Plebani M. The detection and prevention of errors in laboratory medicine. Ann Clin Biochem. 2010; 47(2): 101-110. [DOI:10.1258/acb.2009.009222] [Google Scholar]
15. Shirey C, Perrego K. Standardizing the Handling of Surgical Specimens. AORN journal. 2015; 102(5): 516.e1-516.e10. [View at Publisher] [DOI:10.1016/j.aorn.2015.09.012] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16. Bruns DE. Improving training in laboratory medicine. Clin Chim Acta. 2008; 393(1): 3-4. [View at Publisher] [DOI:10.1373/clinchem.2006.068551] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17. Hassler S, Donzé G, Esch PM, Eschbach B, Hartmann H, Hutter L, et al. Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)‐guidelines for the acquisition and processing of electronic raw data in a GLP environment. The Quality Assurance Journal. 2006; 10(1): 3-14. [View at Publisher] [DOI:10.1002/qaj.356] [Google Scholar]
18. Tolkin L, Glick S. [Ethical behavioral standards of medical students on examinations and studies]. Harefuah. 2007; 146(6): 429-34, 502. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19. Langat P, Pisartchik D, Silva D, Bernard C, Olsen K, Smith M, et al., Is there a duty to share? Ethics of sharing research data in the context of public health emergencies. Public Health Ethics, 2011; 4(1): 4-11. [DOI:10.1093/phe/phr005] [Google Scholar]
20. Palicka V, Haskovcova H. Ethical problems in laboratory research in medicine. Cas Lek Cesk. 1992; 131(3): 65-7. [PubMed]
21. Wijeratne N, Benatar SR. Ethical issues in laboratory medicine. 2010; BMJ Publishing Group. [View at Publisher] [DOI:10.1136/jcp.2007.054494] [Google Scholar]
22. Omidfar K. An overview of ethical issues in medical laboratories. Iranian Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine. 2015; 8(4): 1-11. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
23. Wiwanitkit V. Ethics of clinical pathologist. J Med Assoc Thai. 2006; 89(12): 2161-2. [View at Publisher] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24. Parsa M. Medicine and patients' privacy. ijme. 2009; 2(4) :1-14 [View at Publisher]
25. ISO 15189:2007. Medical laboratories — Particular requirements for quality and competence. 2007 (accessed in 2015). [View at Publisher]
26. Parsa M, Larijani B. Fee splitting: meaning, history, and ethical codes. ijme. 2010; 3 (1 and 2) :21-28 [View at Publisher]
27. Larijani B, Zahedi F. MEDICINE AND MODERN MEDICAL ETHICS. ijdld. 2005; 4 :1-11 [View at Publisher]
28. Zahedi Avval F, Ghazvini K, Youssefi M. Ethical and Professional Issues Training for Students and Staff of Laboratory Medicine. FMEJ. 2014; 4(1): 13-16. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
29. Naji Z, Rezaee-Zavareh MS, Salamati P. Research Ethics Promotion in Higher Education Institutes. Sci Eng Ethics. 2018; 24(2): 817-818. [DOI:10.1007/s11948-017-9888-0] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30. Booth JM, Garrett JM. Instructors' practices in and attitudes toward teaching ethics in the genetics classroom. Genetics. 2004; 168(3): 1111-7. [View at Publisher] [DOI:10.1534/genetics.103.023077] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31. Smith BR. Meeting the curriculum needs for different career paths in Laboratory Medicine. Clin Chim Acta. 2008; 393(1): 5-8. [View at Publisher] [DOI:10.1016/j.cca.2008.03.019] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32. Desikan P, Chakrabarti A, Muthuswamy V. Ethical issues in microbiology. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2011; 29(4): 327-30. [View at Publisher] [DOI:10.4103/0255-0857.90154] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
33. Khayatzadeh-Mahani A, Fotaki M, Harvey G. Ethical theories and values in priority setting: a case study of the Iranian health system. Public Health Ethics. 2012; 6(1): 60-72. [View at Publisher] [DOI:10.1093/phe/phs026] [Google Scholar]
34. Stempsey WE. The virtuous pathologist. An ethical basis for laboratory medicine. Am J Clin Pathol. 1989; 91(6): 730-8. [View at Publisher] [DOI:10.1093/ajcp/91.6.730] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35. Povar GJ. Ethics committees: is there a role for them in the laboratory? Clin Lab Manage Rev. 1991; 5(4): 236-7, 240-3. [View at Publisher] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2007 All Rights Reserved | Medical Laboratory Journal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.