XML Print


1- aDepartment of Microbiology North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Teheran, Iran
2- bFood Safety Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, 2660, Vali-Asr Ave, Tehran, Iran. , mahboubi@sbmu.ac.ir
3- Department of Microbiology North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Teheran, Iran.
4- Department of Microbiology and Applied Microbiology Research Center, Systems biology and poisonings institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical sciences, Tehran, Iran
5- Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
Abstract:   (19 Views)
ABSTRACT 
Background and objectives: Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are potential candidates for the mucosal vaccine. Staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB), as a potent superantigen exotoxin is associated with widespread dietary poisoning and induction of toxic shock syndrome. Also, cholera toxin is the most important virulence factor in Vibrio cholera pathogenicity. CTB, a well-known immune adjuvant, enhances immunity and is mainly used to produce recombinant vaccines as antigen immunization enhancers. This study aimed to produce recombinant Lactobacillus Plantarum as a candidate vaccine against Vibrio cholera producing Cholera toxin and Staphylococcus aureus producing enterotoxin SEB. Methods:  A gene sequence encoding  SEB, devoid of superantigenic activity, and CTB were successfully designed, synthesized, cloned, and then expressed in a secreted form in the Lactobacillus Plantarum. The recombinant protein containing His-Tag was purified by Ni-NTA Agarose ion-exchange chromatography column.  The purified protein was confirmed by Western blotting. Results: The result of this study demonstrated the expression of this recombinant protein in the Lactobacillus Plantarum system by pnz7021 expression vector. The protein electrophoresis showed that the molecular weight of recombinant fusion protein was 52 kDa. Western blot analysis also confirmed the production of recombinant protein. The use of recombinant vaccines has received a great deal of attention today. LP-pnz7021–SP-rseb-ctxB can be used as a suitable candidate in recombinant vaccines against Vibrio cholera producing Cholera toxin and Staphylococcus aureus producing enterotoxin SEB.
 
Full-Text [PDF 460 kb]   (11 Downloads)    
Research Article: Research Article | Subject: Microbiology
Received: 2021/05/4 | Accepted: 2021/06/28

References
1. Kadariya J, Smith TC, Thapaliya D. Staphylococcus aureus and staphylococcal food-borne disease: an ongoing challenge in public health. Biomed Res Int. 2014:2014:827965. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
2. Adachi K, Kawana K, Yokoyama T, Fujii T, Tomio A, Miura S, et al. Oral immunization with a Lactobacillus casei vaccine expressing human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 E7 is an effective strategy to induce mucosal cytotoxic lymphocytes against HPV16 E7. Vaccine. 2010;28(16):2810-7. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
3. Milach A, de los Santos JRG, Turnes CG, Moreira ÂN, de Assis RA, Salvarani FM, et al. Production and characterization of Clostridium perfringens recombinant β toxoid. Anaerobe. 2012;18(3):363-5. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
4. Liu C, Shi C, Li M, Wang M, Ma C, Wang Z. Rapid and simple detection of viable foodborne pathogen Staphylococcus aureus. Front Chem.2019;7:124. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
5. Sergelidis D, Angelidis AS. Methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a controversial food‐borne pathogen. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2017;64(6):409-18. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
6. Bae JS, Da F, Liu R, He L, Lv H, Fisher EL, et al. Contribution of Staphylococcal Enterotoxin B to Staphylococcus aureus Systemic Infection. The J Infect Dis. 2021;223(10):1766-75. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
7. Mathiesen G, Sveen A, Brurberg MB, Fredriksen L, Axelsson L, Eijsink VG. Genome-wide analysis of signal peptide functionality in Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1. BMC Genomics. 2009;10:425. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID]
8. Jia S, Huang X, Li H, Zheng D, Wang L, Qiao X, et al. Immunogenicity evaluation of recombinant Lactobacillus casei W56 expressing bovine viral diarrhea virus E2 protein in conjunction with cholera toxin B subunit as an adjuvant. Microb Cell Fact. 2020;19(1):186. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
9. Ferreira DM, Darrieux M, Oliveira MLS, Leite LC, Miyaji EN. Optimized immune response elicited by a DNA vaccine expressing pneumococcal surface protein a is characterized by a balanced immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1)/IgG2a ratio and proinflammatory cytokine production. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2008;15(3):499-505. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
10. Souod N, Kargar M, Hoseini MH, Jafarinia M. Fusion-expressed CtxB-TcpA-C-CPE improves both systemic and mucosal humoral and T-cell responses against cholera in mice. Microb Pathog. 2021;157:104978. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
11. Boles JW, Pitt MLM, LeClaire RD, Gibbs PH, Torres E, Dyas B, et al. Generation of protective immunity by inactivated recombinant staphylococcal enterotoxin B vaccine in nonhuman primates and identification of correlates of immunity. Clin Immunol. 2003;108(1):51-9. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
12. Bermúdez-Humarán LG, Kharrat P, Chatel J-M, Langella P. Lactococci and lactobacilli as mucosal delivery vectors for therapeutic proteins and DNA vaccines. Microb Cell Fact. 2011;10(1):1-10. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
13. Allain T, Mansour NM, Bahr MM, Martin R, Florent I, Langella P, et al. A new lactobacilli in vivo expression system for the production and delivery of heterologous proteins at mucosal surfaces. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2016;363(13):fnw117. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
14. Ljungh A, Wadstrom T. Lactic acid bacteria as probiotics. Curr Issues Intest Microbiol. 2006;7(2):73-90. [View at Publisher] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
15. Wyszyńska A, Kobierecka P, Bardowski J, Jagusztyn-Krynicka EK. Lactic acid bacteria-20 years exploring their potential as live vectors for mucosal vaccination. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;99(7):2967-77. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
16. Bron PA, Kleerebezem M. Lactic acid bacteria for delivery of endogenous or engineered therapeutic molecules. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:1821. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
17. Israr B, Kim J, Anam S, Anjum F. Lactic Acid Bacteria as Vectors: A Novel Approach for Mucosal Vaccine Delivery. J Clin Cell. 2018. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
18. Dadar M, Shahali Y, Mojgani N. Probiotic bacteria as a functional delivery vehicle for the development of live oral vaccines. In: Mojgani N, Dadar M, editors. Probiotic bacteria and postbiotic metabolites: role in animal and human health. Singapore: Springer; 2021. p. 319-35 [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
19. Nijland R, Lindner C, van Hartskamp M, Hamoen LW, Kuipers OP. Heterologous production and secretion of Clostridium perfringens beta-toxoid in closely related Gram-positive hosts. J Biotechnol. 2007;127(3):361-72. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
20. Salvarani FM, Conceicão FR, Cunha CE, Moreira GM, Pires PS, Silva RO, et al. Vaccination with recombinant Clostridium perfringens toxoids α and β promotes elevated antepartum and passive humoral immunity in swine. Vaccine. 2013;31(38):4152-5. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
21. Plavec TV, Berlec A. Engineering of lactic acid bacteria for delivery of therapeutic proteins and peptides. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019;103(5):2053-66. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
22. Asensi GF, de Sales NFF, Dutra FF, Feijó DF, Bozza MT, Ulrich RG, et al. Oral immunization with Lactococcus lactis secreting attenuated recombinant staphylococcal enterotoxin B induces a protective immune response in a murine model. Microb Cell Fact. 2013;12:32. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
23. Nazarian S, Gargari SLM, Rasooli I, Amani J, Bagheri S, Alerasool M. An in silico chimeric multi subunit vaccine targeting virulence factors of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) with its bacterial inbuilt adjuvant. J Microbiol Methods. 2012;90(1):36-45. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
24. Ulrich RG, Olson MA, Bavari S. Development of engineered vaccines effective against structurally related bacterial superantigens. Vaccine. 1998;16(19):1857-64. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
25. Hongying F, Xianbo W, Fang Y, Yang B, Beiguo L. Oral immunization with recombinant Lactobacillus acidophilus expressing the adhesin Hp0410 of Helicobacter pylori induces mucosal and systemic immune responses. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2014;21(2):126-32. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
26. Berzofsky JA, Ahlers JD, Belyakov IM. Strategies for designing and optimizing new generation vaccines. Nat Rev Immunol. 2001;1(3):209-19. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
27. Alerasol M, Gargari SLM, Nazarian S, Bagheri S. Immunogenicity of a fusion protein comprising coli surface antigen 3 and labile B subunit of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Iran Biomed J. 2014;18(4):212-8. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
28. Jafari D, Malih S, Gomari MM, Safari M, Jafari R, Farajollahi MM. Designing a chimeric subunit vaccine for influenza virus, based on HA2, M2e and CTxB: a bioinformatics study. BMC Mol Cell Biol. 2020;21(1):89. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
29. Amani J, Salmanian AH, Rafati S, Mousavi SL. Immunogenic properties of chimeric protein from espA, eae and tir genes of Escherichia coli O157: H7. Vaccine. 2010;28(42):6923-9. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
30. Khaloiee F, Pourfarzam P, Rasooli I, Amani J, Nazarian S, Mousavi SL. In silico analysis of chimeric recombinant immunogen against three diarrhea causing bacteria. Journal of Cell and Molecular Research. 2013;5(2):65-74. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
31. Sørvig E, Mathiesen G, Naterstad K, Eijsink VG, Axelsson L. High-level, inducible gene expression in Lactobacillus sakei and Lactobacillus plantarum using versatile expression vectors. Microbiology. 2005;151(7):2439-49. [DOI:10.1099/mic.0.28084-0] [PMID]
32. Szatraj K, Szczepankowska AK, Chmielewska‐Jeznach M. Lactic acid bacteria-promising vaccine vectors: possibilities, limitations, doubts. Journal of applied microbiology. 2017;123(2):325-39. [DOI:10.1111/jam.13446] [PMID] []
33. Mathiesen G, Sveen A, Piard JC, Axelsson L, Eijsink V. Heterologous protein secretion by Lactobacillus plantarum using homologous signal peptides. Journal of applied microbiology. 2008;105(1):215-26. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03734.x] [PMID]
34. Oliveira MLS, Monedero V, Miyaji EN, Leite LC, Lee Ho P, Pérez-Martínez G. Expression of Streptococcus pneumoniae antigens, PsaA (pneumococcal surface antigen A) and PspA (pneumococcal surface protein A) by Lactobacillus casei. FEMS microbiology letters. 2003;227(1):25-31. [DOI:10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00645-1] [PMID]
35. Reveneau N, Geoffroy M-C, Locht C, Chagnaud P, Mercenier A. Comparison of the immune responses induced by local immunizations with recombinant Lactobacillus plantarum producing tetanus toxin fragment C in different cellular locations. Vaccine. 2002;20(13-14):1769-77. [DOI:10.1016/S0264-410X(02)00027-0] [PMID]
36. Guo S, Peng J, Xiao Y, Liu Y, Hao W, Yang X, et al. The Construction and Immunoadjuvant Activities of the Oral Interleukin-17B Expressed by Lactobacillus plantarum NC8 Strain in the Infectious Bronchitis Virus Vaccination of Chickens. Vaccines. 2020;8(2):282. [DOI:10.3390/vaccines8020282] [PMID] []
37. Wang J, Jiang H, Yang R, Zhang S, Zhao W, Hu J, et al. Construction and evaluation of recombinant Lactobacillus plantarum NC8 delivering one single or two copies of G protein fused with a DC-targeting peptide (DCpep) as novel oral rabies vaccine. Veterinary Microbiology. 2020;251:108906. [DOI:10.1016/j.vetmic.2020.108906] [PMID]
38. Cortes-Perez NG, Lefèvre F, Corthier G, Adel-Patient K, Langella P, Bermúdez-Humarán LG. Influence of the route of immunization and the nature of the bacterial vector on immunogenicity of mucosal vaccines based on lactic acid bacteria. Vaccine. 2007;25(36):6581-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.06.062] [PMID]
39. Formal S, Baron L, Kopecko D, Washington O, Powell C, Life C. Construction of a potential bivalent vaccine strain: introduction of Shigella sonnei form I antigen genes into the galE Salmonella typhi Ty21a typhoid vaccine strain. Infection and immunity. 1981;34(3):746-50. [DOI:10.1128/iai.34.3.746-750.1981] [PMID] []
40. Daniel C, Poiret S, Dennin V, Boutillier D, Pot B. Bioluminescence imaging study of spatial and temporal persistence of Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactococcus lactis in living mice. Applied and environmental microbiology. 2013;79(4):1086-94. [DOI:10.1128/AEM.03221-12] [PMID] []
41. Shimosato T, Kitazawa H, Katoh S, Tohno M, Iliev ID, Nagasawa C, et al. Augmentation of TH-1 type response by immunoactive AT oligonucleotide from lactic acid bacteria via Toll-like receptor 9 signaling. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2005;326(4):782-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.11.119] [PMID]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2007 All Rights Reserved | Medical Laboratory Journal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.